
The location only sharpens that effect. The Museum rises directly across from the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and sits at the doorstep of USC, so the futuristic and the historic trade glances across the street. Inside, in a genuinely unusual move for a museum, actual windows — not just skylights — let you look out from the galleries onto the USC campus, the Coliseum’s rim, and the Museum’s own gardens below. Those gardens are worth wandering through in their own right: 13 verdant, landscaped acres carved out of dense urban Los Angeles, an almost startling amount of green space so close to downtown.
Inside, the curatorial philosophy is just as eclectic as the architecture. Don’t come expecting a greatest-hits survey of art history. Yes, there is a Picasso here, a Pissarro, a Van Gogh, a Renoir — but they share wall space, and equal billing, with artists most visitors will have never encountered before (certainly not in a museum setting). Almost nothing predates 1900, save for Winslow Homer and a small handful of others. There is plenty of David Hockney on offer in the voluminous gift shop, so I assume I missed that late genius’ work elsewhere in the Museum.
Old school art aficionados will be initially perturbed with the “lowbrow” art displayed, that has been dismissed for eons. Here, the curatorial mindset is that such “lowbrow” works in a conventional art-history context deserve the same reverence typically reserved for the old masters. Judging by our tour through the Lucas, I agree.
Norman Rockwell is probably the most recognizable name you’ll find here, and in this context his gift becomes newly legible: his ability to compress an entire narrative — a whole relationship, a whole moment of American life — into a single illustrated panel is genuinely remarkable when you slow down and actually study it, rather than glancing past it as “just” an old magazine cover. And a few galleries later, finding a rendering of Alfred E. Neuman — Mad magazine’s gap-toothed mascot — hanging within sight of a Picasso is the kind of juxtaposition that shouldn’t and wouldn’t work in a traditional. But it works fine here. It’s startling at first, and then, a beat later, deeply satisfying: proof the Museum means what it says about narrative art recognizing no hierarchy of taste.
Given that a viable definition of “art” is “that which creates a pause for thought,” certainly the Lucas Museum complies.
The photography galleries may be the Museum’s quiet triumph. Richard Avedon’s portrait of The Beatles hangs with the kind of clarity and presence that stops foot traffic, and nearby — almost as a reward for lingering — is one of the six frames Iain Macmillan shot on Abbey Road the morning he produced what might be the most famous album cover in music history. Seeing the sequence of near-identical frames side by side makes plain just how much of that image’s power came down to a single, fleeting choice. The Museum also includes a tasty selection of Banksy, regardless of whether you exit through the gift shop.
The Lucas Museum’s own language for its thesis: “Encompassing everything from prehistoric cave paintings to today’s screen art, the Lucas Museum explores and celebrates the power of visual storytelling to inspire individuals, give shape to beliefs and ideals, and forge community.” Having walked it, that reads less like marketing copy than an accurate description.
We want to come back soon to spend time in the lovely library and further explore the non-random eclectic collection. And I want to find that Hockney.
(photos by Joy Auerbach)